检察机关依职权监督民事案件应当明确的两个问题

来源 :人民检察 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:zhe0731
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
依职权监督是民事检察监督的启动方式之一,修改后民事诉讼法生效后,虽然检、法两家对于依职权监督当事人申请是否应当作为前置程序存在分歧,但《人民检察院民事诉讼监督规则(试行)》确认了检察机关依职权监督的权力和范围。在实践中,对上述规定的理解和适用,仍有待进一步明确和完善。一、认定民诉法第二百零八条和第二百零九条关系的分歧民事诉讼法的修改,让检法两部门对一些法条的理解出现了分歧,其中,第二百零八条 Supervision by authority is one of the ways of initiating civil procuratorial supervision. After the amended Civil Procedure Law came into effect, although both the prosecutorial and the judicial authorities were divided over whether to supervise the parties’ application as a pre-process, the People’s Procuratorate Rules on Civil Procedure Supervision (Trial) "confirms the power and scope of procuratorial organs to supervise according to their powers. In practice, the understanding and application of the above provisions still need to be further clarified and improved. First, finds differences between the Article 208 and the Article 209 of the Civil Procedure Law The revision of the Civil Procedure Law made the two departments of the prosecution and the law disagree on the understanding of some laws and regulations. Among them, the two hundred and eighth Article
其他文献
say good-bye  你送我的半岛铁盒  依然闪着光芒  古老的钥匙将它打开  一张薄纸  宣告着离别  火车颠簸  把我们带到天涯海角
人权是一项带有普世性的权利。尊重和保障人权是世界法治国家的正义追求,也是中国司法制度发展的目的和归宿。从上个世纪末到本世纪初,我国人权事业有了重大发展和进步!中国