论文部分内容阅读
最大最小值规则是罗尔斯正义理论的一个重要范畴,被罗尔斯认为最适合原初状态的选择方法。海萨尼则认为,忽视对或然性的计算将导致不合理的选择结果,期望效用最大化原则才是不确定条件下的最佳选择方法。罗尔斯无法绕开效用最大化原则,主要表现在两个方面:(1)对无知之幕的解释前后矛盾。(2)论证两个正义原则的两种方式前后不一致。
The rule of maximum and minimum is an important category of Rawls’ theory of justice, and is the method of choice that Rawls thinks is best suited to the original state. Hassani believes that ignoring the calculation of probability will lead to irrational choice results, and the expectation that the principle of maximizing utility is the best choice under uncertainty. Rawls can not circumvent the principle of maximizing utility, mainly in two aspects: (1) the interpretation of the curtain of ignorance contradictory. (2) The two ways of justifying the two principles of justice are inconsistent.