论文部分内容阅读
主持人按当制定法日益成熟,进而形成相对稳定的法律体系后,如何更好地将抽象的法律规范适用于具体的个案中,就成为司法乃至整个法律职业共同体应当共同关注的问题。与令人敬仰的法学著作相比,法官在个案裁判中隐含的释法智慧与利益衡量更让人怦然心动。与英美法系法官可以通过判例创造法的传统不同,大陆法系法官只能在适用制定法的过程中彰显裁判的理念、技术与经验。尽管大陆法系的裁判方式给法官
When the moderator becomes more and more mature and then forms a relatively stable legal system, how to better apply the abstract legal norms to specific cases becomes the common concern of the judiciary and the legal profession as a whole. Compared with admirable legal writings, judges implicate the interpretation of wisdom and interests in case judgments even more impressive. Different from the traditions of jurisprudence of common law jurisdictions that can be used to create law, civil law judges in continental law can only demonstrate the concept, technology and experience of referees during the process of applying statutory law. Although the civil law system to judge the way