以笔者田野调查的案例作为切入点,对法官角色与法律意识之间的相互关系进行了分析。正是在人们意识中构成的一些图式,为社会行动提供了命名或话语权力,并被运用于特定的场景和互动之中;而不同的资源结构和组合关系又导致法官案件处理的差异无所不在,法官角色也存在因案而异的行为逻辑,即面对什么类型的案子,采取什么策略,是法官对具有不同利益和社会背景的当事人、律师以及干预者之间互动作用的认识结果,也是案件利害关系人,围绕着审判权,如何去达到自己目标的博弈过程。在此博弈过程中,当事人的法律意识在敬畏法律、利用法律和对抗法律之间进行转换。研究结论,从社会的长远发展来看,法官角色必须由目前的纠纷解决型逐步向规则之治型转变。 Based on the fieldwork of the author, this paper analyzes the interrelationship between judges’ roles and legal awareness. It is people who are in the formation of some of the schemata for social action naming or discourse power, and was applied to a specific scene and interaction; and different resource structure and the combination of the law also led to differences in the handling of cases of judges everywhere There is also a behavioral logic that varies from one case to another. That is, the type of case and the strategy adopted are the result of the judge’s understanding of the interaction between parties, lawyers and interveners who have different interests and social backgrounds. Case stakeholders, around the jurisdiction, how to achieve their goal of the game process. In the process of this game, the legal awareness of the parties in the fear of law, the use of law and confrontation between the law conversion. Research conclusions, judging from the long-term development of society, the judge’s role must be gradually changed from the current dispute resolution type to the rule-based type.