论文部分内容阅读
1944年上半年,为了配合开辟欧洲第二战场的“霸王”行动,美国主张再进行一个代号为“铁砧”的辅助战役,即英美盟军在法国南部登陆,同“霸王”行动南北呼应,分进合击。英国则主张进行“腋窝”行动,即扩大在意大利已有的攻势,同“霸王”行动遥相配合即可。这种军事行动的分歧和争论,既是前两年两国欧洲战略争论的继续和发展,也反映了第二次世界大战后期两国在政治目的和对外政策方面的分歧和差异。
In the first half of 1944, in support of the “overlord” operation that opened Europe’s second battlefield, the United States advocated another auxiliary campaign codenamed “anvil”, that is, the allied forces of the United States and China landed in the south of France, “Action North-South echo, points into co-operation. The United Kingdom advocates an ”armpit“ operation, that is, expanding the existing offensive in Italy and coordinating with the ”overlord" action. The differences and controversies in such military operations are not only the continuation and development of the European strategic debate in the past two years but also the differences and differences in political purposes and foreign policies between the two countries in the latter part of the Second World War.