北京大学艺术系教授朱青生博士在《这是现代艺术》一文中为了达到他为“行为艺术”涂脂抹粉、歌功颂德的目的,一方面不惜贬低别人,认为《美术》杂志组织关于“行为艺术”的讨论“目前还不具备基础背景知识”,只有等他先来给大家上一堂“现代艺术”的启蒙课之后,才能够开始进行讨论,否则,就不能“防止行外人士”把这些“艺术的专门活动”误当作是“社会上的反常行为”。另一方面,他在论文中散布了一些极不符合事实,甚至极其荒谬的观点。他的观点涉及到如何看待“现代派艺术”,现代派艺术在国外是不是占有主流地位?以及如何创新等一系列重大问题,因此,我不得不指出他论点的荒谬和论据的不成立,免得谬论传播、混淆视听,损害艺术的健康发展。 其一,朱博士把艺术分为两种“一种是当代艺术,一种是现代艺术”。(准确地讲,他所说的“现代艺术”实质上是指“现代派艺术”)。紧接着他写道:“在所有发达国家,现代艺术已成为艺术的主流,成为政府资助和个人收藏的主体,成为社会文化 In his article “This is Modern Art”, Dr. Zhu Qingsheng, a professor of art at Peking University, did not hesitate to belittle other people in order to achieve his purpose of “performing arts.” He considered “art” magazine’s discussion on “performance art” We do not have the basic background at present. Only after he has enrolled in the enlightenment class of “Modern Art,” can we start the discussion. Otherwise, we can not “prevent outsiders from putting these special artistic activities ”Mistaken as“ anomalous behavior in society. ” On the other hand, he dismissed in the dissertation some extremely unfounded or even absurd views. His point of view relates to how to view the “modernist art”, whether modernist art holds a dominant position in foreign countries and how to innovate. Therefore, I have to point out the absurdity of his argument and the fallacy of arguments Disseminate and confuse the audiovisual and harm the healthy development of the arts. First, Dr. Zhu divides art into two categories: “one is contemporary art and the other is modern art.” (To be precise, what he calls “modern art” essentially refers to “modernist art”). Then he wrote: "In all developed countries, modern art has become the mainstream of art, becoming the mainstay of government-funded and personal collections and becoming a social culture