论文部分内容阅读
伴随网络犯罪的逐渐高发与犯罪异化,重视对于现有罪名体系的司法解释.将既有罪名体系延伸适用于网络空间,逐渐成为应对网络犯罪的重要路径之一。既往的司法解释围绕网络犯罪的“定性”与“定量”问题进行了一系列的探索性解释,但仍然普遍存在重视“定量”标准构建.忽视“定性”要件解释的偏科性问题。未来的司法解释需充分关注信息技术与法律、信息技术与犯罪结合的规律,在继续构建网络犯罪“定量”标准体系的同时,应重视常见多发罪名条文中的“关键词”解释。通过颁行一系列常见多发网络犯罪的司法解释,不断增强刑法制裁评价网络犯罪的可操作性和生命力。
With the gradual high incidence of cybercrime and the alienation of crime, attention is paid to the judicial interpretation of the existing system of accusation, and the extension of the system of accusation into cyberspace has gradually become one of the important ways to deal with cybercrime. The past judicial interpretations have carried out a series of exploratory interpretations on the “qualitative” and “quantitative” issues of cybercrime, but there is still widespread attention to the “quantitative” standard construction. Partial problem of science. In the future, judicatory interpretation should fully pay attention to the law of combining information technology and law, information technology and crime. While continuing to construct the “quantitative” standard system of cybercrime, we should attach importance to the explanation of “key words” in the common multiple offenses clause . Through the issuance of a series of judicial interpretations of a number of commonly occurring cybercrimes, the sanctions on criminal law are constantly being enhanced to evaluate the operability and vitality of cybercrime.