从阅读程式到修辞话语——乔纳森·卡勒的结构主义抒情诗理论

来源 :外国文学动态研究 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:shanon0577
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
卡勒的《抒情诗理论》以古希腊的爱情诗开局,以美国的现代自由体诗收篇,分析了西方抒情诗的诸多名篇名作。在具体作品阐释的基础上,他系统梳理了相关批评文献,结合黑格尔的美学、奥斯汀的话语行为理论、阿多诺的辩证美学,从体裁特征、内在品质、反摹仿性、公共话语模式四个方面,阐明了抒情诗独有的颂扬、夸张、表演、节奏、呼语、戏剧性、非进行现在时等修辞特色。他的《结构主义诗学》超越了文学批评中的唯阐释论,而《抒情诗理论》以间接言说、反摹仿、仪式化等批评理念,建构了一套结构主义的抒情诗学,突破了自亚里士多德以来的唯摹仿论。 Karl’s “Theory of Lyric Poems” started with the love poems of ancient Greece and analyzed the famous masterpieces of western lyric poetry with the collection of modern liberal poetry in the United States. Based on the concrete works, he systematically sorted out relevant critical documents, combined with Hegel’s aesthetics, Austin’s theory of discourse and Adorno’s dialectical aesthetics. From the aspects of genre characteristics, intrinsic quality, anti-imitation, public discourse The fourth part expounds the rhetorical features of lyric poems such as extolling, exaggeration, performance, rhythm, utterance, dramatic, non-present time. His “Structuralist Poetics” transcends the only interpretation in literary criticism, whereas “The Lyric Poetry” constructs a set of structuralistic lyrical poetics through the criticisms of indirect speech, imitation and ritualization, breaking through the The Tracing and Argument Since Aristotle
其他文献
从社会关系角度研究知识转移的障碍具有一定的理论价值与现实意义。文章从此角度出发总结出社会知识转移的四大障碍,分别为社会心理障碍、组织结构障碍、社会环境障碍与深层