论文部分内容阅读
经济社会学是经济学与社会学相交融而产生的一门交叉学科．因此，尝试在经济学与社会学之间就各自的研究路径进行比较，对于经济社会学的发展将是很有裨益的。所谓研究路径就是研究的路线、程序，即研究展开的思路．具体指的是从一个基本假定出发去构建理论与方法，分析、解释现实问题的思维过程．它包括基本假定、理论化模式与研究方法以及政策应用三个方面．其中基本假定是最为根本的、核心的方面，其他方面都是以它为基础的．本文就是从以上三个方面去展开经济学与社会学研究路径之间比较的．经济学与社会学由于在基本假定方面的不同导致了理论化模式与研究方法以及政策应用方面的不同。经济学与社会学在研究路径方面的不同，用一句话来概括，即是：在经济学中的非现实而“干净的模型”，而在社会学中现实而“肮脏的手”。
Economic sociology is an interdisciplinary discipline created by the combination of economics and sociology. Therefore, an attempt to compare their respective paths of study between economics and sociology will be of great benefit to the development of economic sociology. The so-called research path is the study of the route, procedures, that is, research ideas. Specifically, it refers to starting from a basic assumption to construct theories and methods to analyze and explain the thinking process of realistic problems. It includes three basic assumptions, theoretical models and research methods and application of policies. The basic assumptions are the most fundamental and core aspects, and the rest are based on it. This article is from the above three aspects to start the economic and sociological research path between the comparison. Differences in basic assumptions between economics and sociology have led to differences in theoretical models and research methods and in the application of policies. Differences in the path of study between economics and sociology are summed up in one sentence: the unrealistic “clean model” in economics, and the “dirty hand” in sociology.