论文部分内容阅读
本文主要从三方面对ICSID仲裁员的独立性和公正性问题进行探讨:首先,基于公正性标准的内涵,厘清独立性和公正性的关系;其次,对比国际商事仲裁和各国国内法中的公正性标准,探讨其标准能否用于评判ICSID仲裁员公正性,并在此基础上探讨ICSID裁决结果是否违背公正,以及此不公正是否存在固有的发展轨迹;最后,在分析主流学者判断仲裁员是否违反公正性论点之基础上,归纳得出影响ICSID仲裁员公正性的客观因素,包括仲裁庭构成、委任方的影响、公约内容上语境的一致性等,以期将原本抽象的标准具体化。
This article mainly discusses the independence and fairness of ICSID arbitrators from three aspects: First, based on the connotation of fairness standards, clarifies the relationship between independence and impartiality; secondly, contrasts international commercial arbitration and the fairness It discusses whether its standard can be used to judge the impartiality of ICSID arbitrator, and on this basis, it explores whether the result of ICSID ruling is unjust, and whether this injustice has an inherent development path. Finally, Whether it violates the fairness argument and summarizes the objective factors that affect the impartiality of ICSID arbitrators, including the composition of the arbitration tribunal, the influence of the appointing party and the consistency of context in the convention, so as to substantiate the original abstract standard .