论文部分内容阅读
根据《资本论》的相关论述,马克思是基于一个完全的资本主义世界才提出资本积累概念的。但问题是,当马克思将资本积累理解为雇佣工人以及所需的生产资料在数量上的增长时,他就不得不考虑资本主义对非资本主义的渗透所带来的更多无产者,由此,“资本积累”被证明不可能在单一的、完全的资本主义世界中被理解。在马克思身后,卢森堡、维克斯等人都回应了马克思理论中的上述难题,尽管卢森堡侧重于对非资本主义经济模式的关切,而维克斯更注重完全的资本主义语境的前设与价值理论之间的矛盾。无论是哪一种思考,都至少说明马克思的资本积累概念仍有进一步探讨和阐释的理论空间。
According to the related theory of Capital, Marx proposed the concept of capital accumulation based on a complete capitalist world. But the problem is that when Marx understood the accumulation of capital as a hiring worker and the quantitative increase in the means of production required, he had to consider the more proletarians brought about by the infiltration of capitalism into non-capitalism, “Capital accumulation ” proved impossible to be understood in a single, complete capitalist world. Behind Marx, Luxembourg and Vickers all responded to the above-mentioned problems in Marxist theory. Although Luxembourg focused on the concerns of non-capitalist economic models, Vickers paid more attention to the preposition of a complete capitalist context The contradiction between the theory of value. No matter what kind of thinking, at least shows that Marx’s concept of capital accumulation is still to further explore and explain the theoretical space.