论文部分内容阅读
随着科学技术的发展,录音录像技术早已广泛应用于各种个人设备,而且呈现出越来越生活化、隐蔽化的趋势。因使用监控设备或窃听、窃照设备侵犯公民名誉权、隐私权、肖像权的案例时常见诸报端。随着私录视听资料越来越多地被当事人作为证据用于诉讼,司法实践虽对私录视听资料的合法性进行了审查,但现实中尚存在各地认识不一,标准不统一的情况。本文以相关案例为切入点,分析当前实务中对私录视听资料进行司法审查的现状及特点,探索从主体、地点、方法、内容、目的等五个方面对私录视听资料的合法性条件予以规范,以统一裁判尺度,给司法实践以指导。
With the development of science and technology, audio-video recording technology has been widely used in various personal devices for a long time, and has shown a trend of becoming more and more life-oriented and concealed. Due to the use of surveillance equipment or eavesdropping, stealing equipment infringement of citizen’s reputation, privacy, portrait rights often appear in the newspapers. As private audio-visual materials are used more and more by litigants as evidence, the judicial practice has reviewed the legitimacy of private audio-visual materials. However, in reality, there are still different understandings and different standards. Based on the relevant cases, this paper analyzes the status quo and characteristics of judicial review of private audiovisual material in current practice, and explores the legal conditions of private audio-visual material from five aspects: subject, location, method, content and purpose Norms, in order to unify the referee standards, to judicial practice to guide.