论文部分内容阅读
《买卖合同解释》规定无权处分下的买卖合同并非无效,再结合《合同法解释二》中对多重买卖合同下合同也并非无效,合同相对人可以通过主张违约来获得救济,这就承认了负担行为与处分行为的分离。债权形式主义的物权变动模式已经不能解读这种法律理论的进化,而且在无权处分合同下物权变动中不能起到平衡和保护各方当事人利益的作用,因此应该采用物权形式主义的理论来解读物权变动以达到保护各方当事人利益的作用。
It is not null and void that the contract of sale and purchase under the “Right of Discipline” stipulated in the “Explanatory Note of the Sales and Purchase Contract” is not invalid. In addition, the contract under the double sale and purchase contract in the “Explanatory Two of the Contract Law” is not invalid. The opposite party can obtain relief by claiming a breach of contract. Separation of burdens and sanctions. Debt formalism’s change of real right can not interpret the evolution of this legal theory, and it can not play the role of balancing and protecting the interests of all parties under the change of real right without the right to dispose of the contract. Therefore, it should adopt formalism Theory to interpret changes in property rights in order to protect the interests of all parties.