法律行为违背善良风俗中意思要素的分析——从泸州遗赠案开始

来源 :法哲学与法社会学论丛 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:meisck
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
一、概说(一)泸州遗赠案“张学英依与其同居人所立遗嘱诉遗嘱人之妻蒋伦芳给付受遗赠的财产案”~(〔1〕)发生在四川省泸州市,因此,以下简称为“泸州遗赠案”。对于该案,一审法院认为:黄永彬所立的将财产赠与原告的遗嘱,虽有真实意思表示且形式合法,但其对财产的处分违反了继承法和婚姻法的有关规定,根据《民法通则》第7条,民事行为不得违反公共秩序和社会公德,违反者,其行为无效。根据《婚 I. Introduction (1) Luzhou Bequest Case “Zhang Xueying v. Jiang Lunfang pays his bequests to his legatee in accordance with the will of his cohabitants.” (1) occurred in Luzhou, Sichuan Province. Therefore, the following Referred to as “Luzhou legacy case ”. In this case, the court of the first instance held that the will given by Huang Yongbin to present the will of the plaintiff, though having the true meaning and form, is lawful, but its disposal of property violates the relevant provisions of the Inheritance Law and the Marriage Law. According to “General Principles of Civil Law” Article 7, civil acts shall not violate public order and social morality, violators, their acts are invalid. According to "marriage
其他文献
6月的天就像孩子的脸,说变就变。刚才还是晴空万里,一会儿就乌云密布。狗熊知道天快要下雨了,急急忙忙往家里赶。  狗熊在经过木桥时,脚不小心踩在一只翘起的铁钉上,疼得他哇哇直叫。狗熊低头一看,发现这枚钉住木板的铁钉不知怎么高高地翘了起来,脚踩上去当然疼得厉害。狗熊忍着疼痛,一瘸一拐走过了木桥,在桥头的大树下休息。  金丝猴见天就要下雨,匆匆忙忙往家里赶。金丝猴在经过木桥时,脚不小心被木桥上那只高高翘