论文部分内容阅读
本文试图说明,在学院体制中通过实践探索表演艺术,不仅能够对表演研究自身作为一门学科是有所贡献的,而且对于各门学科都会有所贡献。出于许多实际的理由,我们应该在专业的艺术院校以外的其他高等教育机构中研究、教授表演艺术。当然,这种研究教授的实践也需要根据条件限制、地域、经济、工业以及现实需求等因素而加以修正。在英国——这是我最为熟悉的语境——的讨论中,“实践作为研究”(practice-as-research,实践作为研究下文简称PaR)被视为高等教育体制内深入探索表演艺术的一种可行的方法论,这一主张由于工党政府致力于不列颠的“创意产业”(1997年至2010年)而得到了极
This article attempts to illustrate that exploring the performing arts through the practice of the college system not only contributes to the performance study itself as a discipline, but also contributes to various disciplines. For many practical reasons, we should study and teach performing arts in other institutions of higher education outside of professional art schools. Of course, the practice of this kind of research professor also needs to be amended according to factors such as conditions, geography, economy, industry and real needs. In the discussion of the United Kingdom, which I am most familiar with, “practice-as-research” is considered as a higher education institution to explore performance art in depth A viable methodology, a claim that the Labor government gained because of its commitment to Britain’s “creative industries” (1997-2010)