论文部分内容阅读
近若干年来,史学界对“新史料”的追求呈现为一股热潮,在区域社会史领域内也不例外,这固然延续了历史学者重视史料的态度,但也引起了某种担心,这可能容易使人忽视传世文献以及分析传世文献的方法,并忽视传世文献中传递的那些历史信息。事实上,对旧史料做出新解读也是值得提倡的,新旧史料在历史研究中应该并重而不可偏废。
In recent years, the pursuit of “new historical data ” by historians has shown an upsurge, and it is no exception in the field of social history of the region. This notwithstanding the continuation of the historical scholars’ attitudes to historical materials, it has also caused some concern. This can easily lead to the neglect of documents passing through the world and the analysis of methods of passing away documents, as well as the disregard of those historical messages conveyed in passing documents. In fact, it is worth to advocate new interpretation of old historical materials. The historical data of both old and new should be given equal importance and can not be neglected.