祝中熹同志的《“的”与“地”不能合而为一》一文,肯定“的”与“地”的分工很有必要,我们对此有不同的意见。a_1我们需要实事求是的调查。a_2我们需要实事求是地调查。b_1群众合理的要求政府予以答复。b_2群众合理地要求政府予以答复。祝文用以上两组例子说明“的”与“地”可以区别被修饰语的词性,从而可以判断修饰语是定语还是状语。这就是说,第一,定语和状语的区别决定于被修饰语的词性;第二,被修饰语的词性决定于“的”与“地”的分工。单说第一点,我们同意;加上笫二点,我们觉得不妥,因为这等于说“的”与“地”决定了修 I wish Comrade Zhong Xi comrades that “” and “land can not be combined into one” affirm that the division of labor between “and ” land “is necessary. We have different opinions on this. a_1 We need a realistic investigation. a_2 We need to investigate truthfully. b_1 The masses reasonably requested the government to reply. b_2 The masses reasonably demand that the government reply. I wish to use the above two sets of examples that ”“ and ”to “ can distinguish the part of the modified part of speech, which can determine the modifier is attributive or adverbial. That is to say, first, the difference between an attributive and an adverbial is determined by the part of speech of a modifier; and second, the partness of the modifier depends on the division of labor between ”and “. Let alone the first point, we agree; with the second point, we feel wrong, because this is equivalent to saying ”“ and ”"