我们的日常语言如何言说超验的上帝,这是宗教语言观的问题。托马斯发展了柏拉图和亚里士多德的类比理论,提出了自己的类比的宗教语言观。这是中世纪最重要的解决方案之一,但是这也只是部分地解决,托马斯宗教语言观也存在着自己的理论困境。当代学者中,詹姆斯.罗斯继承并发展了托马斯的类比理论,而蒂利希则采取了象征理论的路径来归避托马斯的理论缺失,以求对这一宗教语言观的问题得到满意的解决。 How our everyday language speaks transcendental God is a matter of religious language. Thomas developed the analogy theory of Plato and Aristotle and put forward his own analogy of religious language. This is one of the most important solutions of the Middle Ages, but this is only partly resolved. There are also theoretical difficulties in Thomas’ religious language view. Among contemporary scholars, James Rose inherits and develops Thomas’s analogy theory, and Tillich adopts the path of symbolism to evade Thomas’s theoretical deficiencies so as to solve the problem of this religious linguistic view satisfactorily.