论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比研究无痛人工流产、药物流产治疗早期妊娠患者的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2013年12月收治的155例早期妊娠患者的临床资料,分为无痛人工流产组81例、药物流产组74例.比较两组的完全流产率、阴道出血时间,治疗后月经复潮时间、感染率、继发不孕率。结果:无痛人流组完全流产率为98.77%、阴道出血时间为(6.89±2.46)d、术后感染率l.23%、继发不孕率7.41%;药物流产组分别为89.19%、(12.74±3.92)d、6.76%、2.70%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。无痛人流组和药物流产组月经复潮时间分别为(31.67±3.05)d,为(29.13±2.84)d,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:两种流产方式各有优缺点,临床上应根据患者实际情况和意愿合理选择。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of painless induced abortion and medical abortion in the treatment of early pregnancy. Methods: The clinical data of 155 early pregnancy patients admitted from January 2012 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into painless artificial abortion group (n = 81) and drug abortion group (n = 74), and the rate of complete abortion Bleeding time, menstrual recuperation time after treatment, infection rate, secondary infertility rate. Results: In the painless abortion group, the rate of complete abortion was 98.77%, the duration of vaginal bleeding was 6.89 ± 2.46 days, the rate of postoperative infection was 1.23% and the rate of secondary infertility was 7.41%. The number of abortion group was 89.19% 12.74 ± 3.92) d, 6.76% and 2.70%, respectively. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). The menstrual resuscitation time in painless abortion group and medical abortion group were (31.67 ± 3.05) d, (29.13 ± 2.84) days, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion: The two abortion methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, the clinical should be based on the actual situation and intentions of patients a reasonable choice.