论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨应征青年不同检测环境下采用征兵心理检测系统的差异及影响因素,为制定入伍后心理检测标准提供数据支持。方法采用全国征兵心理检测软件,对384名被试进行不同检测环境下的性格测验,前次检测在武装部进行,后次检测在入伍后4w进行,对两次检测结果进行统计学分析。结果两次检测结果的机检阳性率均无明显差异;性格测验Net(44.37±8.80,46.04±7.06)、Set(44.46±8.05,47.04±8.69)因子后测显著高于前测(t=-3.58,-4.69;P<0.01)Dit(46.08±7.23,44.85±8.72,)、Ant(49.58±9.07,48.28±9.66)因子后测显著低于前测(t=2.52,2.06;P<0.05);环境与文化间不存在交互作用;高文化组在Net、Dit和Ant上存在显著差异(t=5.16,1.67,-2.63;P<0.05),低文化组在Set、Dit和Ant上存在显著差异(t=4.57,2.06,-4.12;P<0.05)。结论征兵心理检测系统具有良好稳定性;建议制定入伍后心理检测标准时要考虑环境和文化因素的影响。
Objective To explore the differences and influencing factors of psychological examination system of conscription recruits in different testing environments of youths recruited for recruitment and to provide data support for the development of mental examination standards after entering military service. Methods 384 subjects were tested under different testing environments using the national recruiting psychological testing software. The last testing was conducted in the armed forces department. The next testing was conducted 4 weeks after enlistment. The results of two tests were statistically analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in the positive rate of the two tests between the two tests. The postnatal tests of Net (44.37 ± 8.80, 46.04 ± 7.06), Set (44.46 ± 8.05, 47.04 ± 8.69) 3.58, -4.69; P <0.01), Dit (46.08 ± 7.23,44.85 ± 8.72), Ant (49.58 ± 9.07,48.28 ± 9.66) There was no interaction between environment and culture; there was significant difference between Net, Dit and Ant in high culture group (t = 5.16,1.67, -2.63; P <0.05); low culture group had significant difference in Set, Dit and Ant Differences (t = 4.57, 2.06, -4.12; P <0.05). Conclusion The conscription psychological detection system has good stability. It is suggested that the psychological and cultural factors should be taken into account when formulating psychological examination standards.