论文部分内容阅读
目的:开发适合中国文化环境的决策能力评估工具。方法:经决策能力量表版权所属机构授权,请有关专家对决策能力量表进行翻译及回译;选取军校学员420名,战士80名,进行验证性因素分析,另用剑桥赌博任务进行效标关联效度研究。结果:采用决策能力量表各分量表标准分进行验证性因素分析证实了6因子结构模型,与国外研究相一致。各分量表Cronbachα在0.625-0.840之间,间隔两个月的重测信度在0.44~0.78之间,各因素与总分的相关系数在0.437-0.689之间。效标关联效度研究发现,决策能力量表分数高低个体在剑桥赌博任务决策质量成绩以及风险调节能力成绩上差异显著。结论:修订后的决策能力量表在军校学员群体中应用具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为决策能力评价的测量工具。
Objective: To develop a decision-making ability assessment tool suitable for Chinese cultural environment. Methods: The authority of the authority of the decision-making power scale copyright authority, ask the experts to translate and interpret the decision-making ability scale; select 420 cadets and 80 warriors for confirmatory factor analysis, and use the Cambridge Gambling Task Study on the correlation validity. Results: The 6-factor structural model was confirmed by the confirmatory factor analysis using the standard scores of each component scale of the decision-making ability scale, which is consistent with the foreign studies. The Cronbachα of each subscales ranged from 0.625 to 0.840 with the test-retest reliability of 0.44 ~ 0.78 at two-month interval. The correlation coefficient of each factor with the total score ranged from 0.437 to 0.689. The validity of the criterion-related validity study found that the score of decision-making ability scale individuals in the quality of decision-making careers in Cambridge gambling tasks and risk-adjusted ability of the results of significant differences. Conclusion: The revised decision-making ability scale has good reliability and validity in the military cadets and can be used as a measurement tool for decision-making ability evaluation.