论文部分内容阅读
两岸服贸协议签署后,引发岛内不同程度反弹。审视这项攸关两岸经济合作框架协议(ECFA)后续协商能否继续向前推进的协议,不难发现,这些争议之中,有过度夸大、渲染对岛内产业冲击的假议题,也有因两岸关系特殊性导致部分业者不安的真议题。故此,必须辨清其中虚实,才能掌握问题对症下药,有效化解争议。从协议内容看,台湾方面给予大陆64项市场开放承诺,和台湾作为台澎金马个别关税领域向WTO(世界贸易组织)所作的119项开放承诺相比,多数易受冲击的行业均已排除在外。64项承
After the cross-Strait trade agreement was signed, the island rebounded to varying degrees. Examining this agreement, which is crucial for whether the follow-up consultations on the Framework for Cross-Strait Economic Cooperation (ECFA) can continue to move forward, we can easily find out that among these disputes, there are over-exaggerated and sham issues that affect the industry in the island. The specificity of the relationship led to some of the real problem of business anxiety. Therefore, one must find out the actual situation in order to grasp the right remedy and effectively resolve the dispute. According to the contents of the agreement, Taiwan has promised to open up 64 markets to the Mainland. Compared with Taiwan’s 119 open commitments made by the WTO (World Trade Organization) to the WTO (World Trade Organization) in the field of individual customs duties in Taiwan, Penghu and Kinmen and Matsu, most of the most vulnerable sectors have been excluded . 64 items bearing