论文部分内容阅读
前些時,爲了考釋吴鎮烽先生《商周青銅器銘文暨圖像集成續編》0420著録的■簋銘文,我寫了一篇小文《新見■簋與“週有八士”》。~([1])■簋的銘文是比較特殊的,其罕見的特點之一,是銘文篇首冠有一個與下文不連的“子”字。我那篇小文已經說明,這樣的“子”字並不是作器者的族氏,而是作器者和該器所祀“父辛”相對應的親稱。文中曾引據我2001年發表的《長子、中子和别子》襄的實例對比。~([2])不過,我2001年同最近寫的這兩篇文章,都未能引及有着同樣特點的“子”字的另一件重要器
Some time ago, in order to examine Mr. Wu Zhen-feng’s “Inscription on the Shang-Zhou Bronze Inscriptions and Image Integration,” re-written in 0420 ■ 簋 inscriptions, I wrote a short essay “ . ~ ([1]) ■ 簋 the inscription is more special, one of its rare features is the first title of the inscription has a ”child“ with the following words. My short essay has shown that such a ”sub“ character is not a clan’s clan, but a pro-clan corresponding to the clan and the ”patron“ of the clan. The article quoted my 2001 example of ”eldest son, neutron and other children“ Xiang contrast. However, neither of these two articles that I recently wrote in 2001 failed to refer to another important ”sub" character with the same characteristics