随着最高人民法院《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》(以下简称为《民事证据规定》)的出台,一向被视为非法证据而排斥的私采视听资料登上证据舞台,从而结束了私采视听资料受制于严格的取证途径要求的命运。于是,便引出对此类证据的分解界定问题,司法实践围绕这朵“悄悄绽放的花蕾? With the promulgation of the Supreme People’s Court’s “Several Provisions on Evidence in Civil Proceedings” (hereinafter referred to as “the Provisions on Civil Evidence”), privately-owned audio-visual materials that have always been excluded as illegitimate evidence are mounted on the stage of evidence, thus ending private acquisition Audio-visual materials are subject to the fate of strict forensic approaches. So, it leads to the decomposition of such evidence to define the issue of judicial practice around this flower "quietly bloom bud?