张怀瓘贬低王羲之的言论并不能看成一个孤立的事件,应当将他放在他所生活的时代背景中,玄宗朝“复古重儒”思潮是一个重要的切入点。在经学上全面否定晋朝仕人“援老入儒”的做法,为文同样要求以汉代以前的经学典籍作为范本,此种做法直接影响到书法的品评,不独张怀瓘,其他的文人亦有相近言论。张怀瓘在朝为官当然是这一潮流的追随者,其批判王羲之草书的罪状,可以看做是文学上主张的翻版,然而由于书法和文学的差异性,张怀瓘此番言论多有牵强附会之嫌。 Zhang Huaiji’s disparagement of Wang Xizhi’s remarks can not be regarded as an isolated incident, and should be placed in the background of the times he lives in. The trend of thinking of Xuanzong dynasty and “reconnecting with Confucianism” is an important starting point. In the classics, the people in Jin Dynasty completely denied the practice of “helping the old people and entering the Confucianism.” This article also requires that the texts of the classics of Confucian classics before the Han Dynasty be used as a model. This practice has a direct impact on the calligrapher’s criticism. Not only is Zhang Huaihuai but also other literati There are similar comments. Of course, Zhang Huai-k’ang’s followers in the DPRK’s officialdom are of course followers of this trend. His critique of Wang Xizhi’s curse can be regarded as a literary version of the copyrighted version. However, because of the differences between calligraphy and literature, Zhang Huai-yen’s remarks are far-fetched .