论文部分内容阅读
对技术的批判有两个来源:一个是马克思,一个是历史主义派别。马克思对资本市场的分析证实了技术的资本主义应用带来的压抑、剥削和解放的命题。而历史主义学派则通过对技术与权力“外在化”的瓦解提出了一种技术的社会批判。近年来后现代的技术政治学也使我们进一步看到技术本身及其在社会关系中更复杂的权力关系。技术不是中立的理性产物,也不是人类和自然的宿命。现代社会可能通过保持技术设计和技术世界斗争的开放性,以实现技术的公正性。
There are two sources of criticism of technology: one is Marx and the other is a historicist faction. Marx’s analysis of the capital market confirms the propositions of repression, exploitation and liberation brought about by the capitalist application of technology. The historicist school proposed a technical social critique through the disintegration of technology and power “externalization ”. In recent years, postmodern technical politics has also enabled us to further appreciate the technology itself and its more complicated power relations in social relations. Technology is not a neutral product of reason nor is it the fate of man and nature. Modern society may achieve technological fairness by preserving the openness of the world of technological design and technology.