论文部分内容阅读
为探究不同安全标志线索对高低度倦怠矿工个体注意返回抑制(IOR)的作用表现,将有无辅助文字安全标志作为2种不同的刺激线索,根据矿工倦怠量表筛选出高低度倦怠个体各20名作为被试,采用线索-靶范式的试验流程,以被试的反应时和正确率为基础,分析低倦怠个体IOR的不同表现。结果表明:2种刺激线索下,2组被试在所有的时间间隔(SOA)均出现IOR现象,且无辅助文字刺激线索下,2组被试的IOR量无显著差异;有辅助文字刺激线索下,高倦怠个体的IOR量明显大于低倦怠个体,说明有辅助文字的刺激线索对IOR有调节作用。
In order to explore the effect of different safety signs on the individual attention return inhibition (IOR) of low and low burnout miners, whether there is any auxiliary word safety sign as the two different clues or not, according to the miners burnout scale, 20 high and low burnout individuals were selected Name as subjects, using clues-target paradigm of the test process to test the response time and correct rate based on the analysis of low burnout IOR different performance. The results showed that under the two kinds of stimulus cues, two groups of subjects showed IOR at all time intervals (SOA), and there was no significant difference in IOR between the two groups in the absence of auxiliary cues; , The IOR of high-burnout individuals was significantly higher than that of low-burnout individuals, indicating that there are auxiliary cues to stimulate the IOR regulation.