论文部分内容阅读
目的通过对声带息肉切除术术式的选择,探讨基层医院怎样为患者提供安全、有效、价廉、方便的服务。方法对声带息肉的患者,采用纤维喉镜下或支撑喉镜下声带息肉切除术,比较两种方法的手术疗效、治疗时间及费用。结果手术疗效好,两组间疗效差异无统计学意义;纤维喉镜下比支撑喉镜下声带息肉切除术省时、经济、方便。结论纤维喉镜下声带息肉切除术是一种有效、安全、省时及省钱的治疗方法,值得推广。
Objective To explore how primary hospitals can provide patients with safe, effective, inexpensive and convenient services through the choice of vocal cord polypectomy. Methods In patients with vocal cord polyps, vocal cord polyp excision was performed under fiber laryngoscope or laryngoscope. The curative effect, treatment time and cost of the two methods were compared. Results The operative effect was good. There was no significant difference in the curative effect between the two groups. Compared with the laryngoscope, the vocal cord polyp excision was more economical and convenient than the laryngoscope. Conclusion Vocal cord polypectomy under fiberoptic laryngoscopy is an effective, safe, time-saving and cost-effective treatment and is worth promoting.