清代文豪纪昀诗作《乌鲁木齐杂诗》,现由郝浚等三位同志全面地加以校勘和注释,并付印出版。诗注对于每首诗均有概括的说明,注释也颇多精辟独到之处;但也应该承认仍有少数地方失之于疏忽,不够妥切,当属美中不足。比如或限于材料,交待不清;或以此为彼、与史实不符;或望文生义,臆断失误等等。虽说有的实属毛发之微,无关大局,但要是加补充说明,似亦不算多余。现在就我所注意到的,认为有必要再做推敲者,录之于后,并妄加评议,谨供参考！ Qing Dynasty literary Ji Yun poem “Urumqi Miscellaneous Poems”, now by Hao Jun and other three comrades to conduct a comprehensive survey and annotation, and print publication. There is a general description of each poem, notes are also incisive and unique; but it should also be acknowledged that there are still a few places are negligent, not properly enough, it is the fly in the ointment. Such as or limited to materials, confessed; or as one, and inconsistent with the historical facts; or literary justification, make mistakes and so on. Although it is true that some hair is micro, it has nothing to do with the overall situation. However, if added, it does not seem redundant. Now I have noticed, think it is necessary to do scrutiny, recorded in the post, and make improper comments, I just for reference!