我结识达灿多年,听他摆谈过许多吴宓先生晚年的故事。改革开放以来,吴宓研究逐渐成为学术文化领域的一个热点,这本是情理之中的事。出人意料的是,许多假“研究”、“忆旧”之名,胡编乱造吴宓生前言行的文字也纷纷出笼,一时竟让人虚实莫测,真伪难辨。针对这种恶浊风气,我曾经在报纸上发表过一篇短文,吁请端正学风。与此同时,我极力怂恿达灿把 I know Tatsu for many years, listen to him talked about the story of many elderly Mr. Wu Mi. Since the reform and opening up, Wu Mi research has gradually become a hot area of ​​academic culture, this is the reason. Surprisingly, many fake “research”, “remember the old” in the name of confusing the words and deeds of Mr. Wu Lisheng have also come out one after another, unexpectedly make people unpredictable, authenticity is difficult to distinguish. In response to such bad habits, I once published an essay in the newspaper calling for a proper style of study. In the meantime, I strongly encourage Tat Chan