论文部分内容阅读
唐朝李善博览群书,“淹贯古今”;晋朝傅迪嗜书如命,“好广读书”。他们二人都有“书簏”之称。然而,他们也确实只起到一个“书簏”的作用,虽然学贯古今,装了满肚子学问,可是竟一点也没能派上用场,也没有任何发明创造。赵普(宋朝)有目的地精读了《论语》世传他“半部《论语》治天下”。可见读书要按照一定的目标,有所选择,有所取舍,决不能依兴之所致,漫无边际地畅游书海。有的人按照一定的目标学习知识,积累知识,根据实际情况建立自己的知识结构,精读了按照自己的目标精选的书籍,涉猎了与自己的发展目标相关的书籍,事半功倍,学有所成。另有些人却不得法,无目标无方向漫无边际地读,见到什么读什么,到头来,所学的知识杂乱无章,没有条理,收效甚微,事倍功半。 今天,知识浩淼无限,任何人凭借任何方法都无法穷尽。学海无涯,这就要求根据自己的实际情况、专业目标、发展方向、工作需要去读书。专深而不狭窄,系统而不杂芜,选择而不盲目地读书,建立切实可行的知识结构。不贪图学得多,而有目标地掌握一些有用的知识,否则,将会象法国哲学家狄镕罗说的那样,“企图无所不知的人,将会一无所知。”要想把所学的知识用于实践,对工作有所裨益,就不能漫无边际泛泛而读。“博学并不是智慧”。广收博采,埋头读书,诰首穷?
The Tang Dynasty Li Shan extensive reading group, “flooded the ancient and modern”; Jin Dynasty Fu Di addicted to books such as life, “good wide reading.” Both of them have the title of “book 簏”. However, they did indeed only play a role of a book writer. Although learning ancient and modern, with full stomach knowledge, they did not come in handy at all and did not have any invention or creation. Zhao Pu (Song Dynasty) deliberately read the Analects of Confucius he “half” analects “rule the world.” Visible to study in accordance with certain goals, have the choice of trade-offs, must not be caused by Hing, boundless swim book sea. Some people learn knowledge according to certain goals, accumulate knowledge, build their own knowledge structure according to the actual situation, and read the books carefully selected according to their own goals. They dabble in books related to their own development goals. . Others, however, have no means of law, no goal, no direction, endless reading, what to read and in the end, what they have learned is disorganized and disorderly, with little success and with less effort. Today, there is so much to know and no one can exhaust with any method. Learning sea knows no boundaries, which requires according to their own actual situation, professional goals, development direction, work needs to go to school. Deep and not narrow, the system without miscellaneous Wu, choose not blindly reading, to establish a viable knowledge structure. Do not seek to learn more, and have some useful knowledge of the target, or, as the French philosopher Di Rongluo said, “the attempt to omniscient people, will know nothing.” The knowledge you have learned is used in practice and is helpful to your work, so you should not read it in an endless way. “Erudition is not wisdom.” Broad acceptance, immersed in reading, the first poor?