“高师”音乐专业的专业教学,似乎长期陷入误区:“一 专多能”的口号喊了多年,可似乎根本未培养出几个真正能够具有“多能”标志的学生！有人将此归咎于“盲目向音乐学院看齐的不良倾向”,于是提出把“一专多能”改成“多能一专”,似乎把“多能”放在前面,“多能”就有了保障。而此举仍然毫不见效！大概还是认为:“高师音乐专业的教师,中‘盲目向音乐学院看齐’之毒太深了,所以‘多能’没法实现”。其实,“一专多能”或“多能一专”之争,是个形而上的肤浅思维方式。它怎能解决实际问题呢? It seems that the professional teaching of “normal university” majoring in music has long been caught in misunderstanding: the slogan of “multi-specialty with one specialty” shouts for many years and there seems to be no student who really has the sign of “multi-energy”! Some people attributed this to “a blind propensity towards the Conservatory of Music.” He therefore proposed that “multi-skill” should be replaced by “multi-skill” and that “multi-skill” should be given priority. “Multi-energy” The protection. And this move is still not effective! Probably still think: “Teachers of music education in normal universities, in the blindness to the conservatory of music ’is too poisonous, so’ can not be achieved ’. In fact, the ”one special skill“ or ”multi-skill one professional" dispute is a metaphysical superficial thinking mode. How can it solve the real problem?