论文部分内容阅读
美国联邦裁判官制度是与中国显著不同的一种法官制度。其裁判官制度的启示在于,不同层级的法官可以有不同的权限;不同层级的法官可以有不同的任期和待遇;不同层级的法官可以有不同的任命方式;不同层级的法官可以有不同的员额。深圳法院“案多人少”问题十分突出,有方案缺陷明显。应学习借鉴美国联邦裁判官制度,在推行法官司员额制的不同,建立“准法官”制度,进一步完善法院人员分类管理体系,加强法官队伍和后备力量建设,理顺司法辅助人员管理体制,提升审判效率。
The system of magistrates in the United States is a system of judges that is significantly different from China. The enlightenment of its magistrate system lies in that different levels of judges may have different powers of authority. Judges of different levels may have different terms of office and treatment. Judges of different levels may have different ways of appointment. Judges of different levels may have different posts . Shenzhen Court “many people less ” problem is very prominent, there are obvious flaws in the program. We should learn from the system of the Federal Magistrates in the United States and set up a “quasi-judge” system based on the implementation of the system of magistrate’s judges to further improve the classification system of court personnel, strengthen the construction of judges and reserve forces, and rationalize the administration of judicial support staff , Improve trial efficiency.