中国科学院和高校图书馆对电子资源有着共同的采购诉求,合作潜力巨大。通过对两大采购联盟进行比较,归纳出两者在利益权衡、文献类型、和规范管理等方面存在的相同点,以及在学科重点、经费来源、信息公开等方面存在的差异。两大联盟渐趋成熟,但仍存在若干问题,建议通过建立统一平台、深入开展调研、推动开放获取、加强交流合作等方式,推动我国电子资源保障可持续发展。 Chinese Academy of Sciences and university libraries have common procurement demands for electronic resources, with great potential for cooperation. Through the comparison of the two major purchasing alliances, this paper concludes the similarities and differences between the two in terms of interest balance, type of literature and standard management, as well as the differences in key disciplines, sources of funding and information disclosure. The two alliances are gradually becoming mature. However, there are still some problems. We suggest that we promote the sustainable development of China’s electronic resources by establishing a unified platform, deepening research, promoting open access, and strengthening exchanges and cooperation.