生产性劳动和非生产性劳动的区分，从一开始就包含着对非生产劳动者的“批判性”。这种“批判性”至今还表现在一些同志的文章中。从这些同志的文章中极易引出科学、教育和服务等劳动者是“寄生性”的，应加以“限制”和“先生产，后科学”，“先生产，后教育”之类的有害结论。评价社会主义制度下的劳动，不能仅从各种劳动的直接结果和物质性质去考察，而应该有一个更纵深的思维方式，有一个现代的财富观念，有一个系统的观念、资源的观念、效率和广泛开拓就业领域的观念 The distinction between productive and unproductive labor, from the very beginning, embraces the “critique” of non-productive workers. This “critical” is still reflected in the articles of some comrades. From these comrades’ essays, workers who can easily lead to science, education and service are “parasitic” and should be endangered as “restricted” and “first-born, post-scientific,” “first-born, post-education” . To evaluate the labor under the socialist system can not be examined solely from the direct results and the material qualities of various kinds of labor but should have a deeper thinking mode, a modern concept of wealth, a systematic concept, a concept of resources, Efficiency and a wide range of ideas in the field of employment