《人民检察》第４期对罗某盗用他人账户买卖股票获利行为的定性提出了四种不同意见。笔者不同意这四种意见，认为罗某的行为应构成故意毁坏财物罪。理由是：一、罗某客观上无实施秘密窃取他人财物的行为，不构成盗窃罪。（１）从股票交易规则来看，根据上海、深圳证券交易... People’s Procuratorate No. 4 put forward four different opinions on the characterization of Luo Mouou’s misappropriation of shares for trading in other people’s accounts. The author disagrees with these four opinions and holds that Luomou’s act should constitute a crime of intentional destruction of property. The reasons are: First, Luomou objectively without secretly stealing property of others, does not constitute a theft. (1) From the rules of stock trading, according to Shanghai, Shenzhen stock exchange ...