论文部分内容阅读
选择性执法是行政权的扩张同法律规范自身局限相互作用的产物,其存在具有合理性与必然性,其在实现个体正义方面具有深远意义。然而,由于我国对选择性执法的程序规制以及监督机制尚不完善,导致实践中出现了许多滥用选择性执法权的现象,极大地降低了公众对选择性执法的认同。因此,我们不应一味地去否定选择性执法,而应积极地引导和规制选择性执法,使其摆脱实践中的困境,实现其制度价值。
Selective law enforcement is a product of the interaction between the expansion of executive power and the limitation of law itself. Its existence is reasonable and inevitable, and it has far-reaching significance in realizing individual justice. However, due to the imperfect procedural regulation and supervisory mechanism of selective law enforcement in our country, many abuses of selective law enforcement have appeared in practice, greatly reducing the public’s approval of selective law enforcement. Therefore, we should not blindly deny selective law enforcement, but should actively guide and regulate selective law enforcement to get rid of the plight in practice and realize the value of the system.