一、关于放“钱”与放“权”的问题 我国的历次财政体制改革,基本上体现了一种“放”的思路。放的特点主要表现在放“钱”,即放财力而不是放“权”上。从中央来看,由于放掉的主要是钱而不是权(这里主要指法律意义上的权力),钱又可以凭权力重新拿回来,故而在某些时期出现“左手放、右手拿”的现象。从地方来看,由于只是得到了“钱”而没有真正得到“权”,或即使在某种程序上得到了某种权力,但这些权力没有用法律正式规定下来,因此,地方在利益的预期性方面较差,心中无底,自然很容易出现某些短期行为。所以,在每次放以后往往就会出现“乱”。对于放之后出现的这种乱,我们把主要原因归结为放的过度,而很少考虑在放“钱”与放“权”之间如何作出选择以及放权有没有法律保障的问题。所以,每次出现乱以后又采取收的办法,收的结果又重蹈覆辙。回到过于集 First, on the release of “money” and the “right” problem China’s previous financial system reform, basically reflects a “release” train of thought. Put the characteristics of the main performance in the “money”, that is, put financial resources rather than “right” on. From a central point of view, since money is mainly discharged instead of money (mainly here in the legal sense of power), money can be re-taken back by power and therefore the phenomenon of “left-hand release and right-hand capture” appears in some periods . Locally, since only “money” has been obtained without really “rights,” or even if some sort of power has been obtained in some kind of procedure, these rights have not been formally stipulated by law, and therefore, the local interest in the expected Poor sex, heartless, naturally prone to some short-term behavior. Therefore, often after each release there will be “chaos.” For such chaos after the release, we attributed the main reason to over-exaggeration, and seldom considered the question of how to make choices between releasing “money” and releasing “power” and whether there is any legal guarantee for delegating power. Therefore, after each chaos, we adopt the method of collection and the results of the collection repeat the same mistakes. Back to too much set