九十年代,政府开始在城市实施居民最低生活保障制度,其中上海、大连、厦门等城市的经验受到重视,被称作模式来加以推广。对这几种模式的共性和差异进行分析可看出,城市贫困救助普遍面临着救助对象不确定、救助手段单一、经费来源无保证、救助申请制度不健全等诸多问题,而且已经影响到救助行动的开展。因此,现阶段应对全面实施最低生活保证制度取慎重态度,对该项制度的基本问题应有一个较长远的回答,如此,才能确保贫困救助的健康稳健发展。 In the 1990s, the government started to implement the minimum living standard for residents in cities. Among them, the experience of Shanghai, Dalian, Xiamen and other cities is valued and is called a model to promote. Analysis of the commonalities and differences between these models shows that urban poverty relief is generally confronted with many problems such as the target of assistance to be rescued, the single means of assistance, the non-guarantee of funding sources and the imperfect system of bailout application, which have affected the rescue operation To carry out. Therefore, at this stage, we should take a cautious attitude toward the full implementation of the minimum life guarantee system and answer the long-term questions to the basic problems of the system. Only in this way can we ensure the healthy and steady development of poverty relief.