论文部分内容阅读
在国富、民富问题上,虽然国富论与民富论都以国富为最终追求。但是,二者在国富和民富孰先孰后、何为民富、国富与民富的关系等问题上存有分歧,甚至形成对立。民富论强调民富与国富统一的一面,侧重民富;国富论强调国富与民富矛盾的一面,偏重国富。通过二者的比较,了解二者的差异及其发展,对探讨中国古代经济由领先到落后这一转变具有追本溯源的意义。同时,指出虽然现代经济思想史将经济学说分为两大类,即主张积极国家干预社会经济和主张国家对社会经济采取放任态度,但是不能简单地将国富论归为前者,因为二者有本质的不同。
On the issues of country rich and people rich, although both wealth and democracy are the ultimate pursuit of wealth. However, the two countries have differences and even opposites on such issues as the prospering of our country and the rich and the rich and the rich, the relationship between the rich and the rich and the rich. Wealth of Man Emphasizes the unification of the rich and the rich and the enrichment of the nation, focusing on the rich and the poor. On the contrary, the Wealth of Nations emphasizes the contradictions between the rich and the rich and the rich in our country. Through the comparison between the two, it is necessary to understand the differences and their development between the two and to trace the significance of exploring the transition from the leading to the backward in China’s ancient economy. At the same time, it is pointed out that although the history of modern economic thought divides economic theory into two broad categories, that is, advocating that active state intervenes in social economy and advocates that the state take a laissez-faire attitude toward social economy, it can not simply classify the Wealth of Nations as the former because both are essential s difference.