《总结》作为机关公文中经常使用的一种文体,对于指导人们的工作、学习和社会实践具有十分重要的作用。但在实践中由于受多方面因素的影响,不少《总结》撰写者往往难以从客观实际出发,进行深入的理论思考,总结出有特色的、具有独创性的、带规律性的东西,如有的《总结》面面俱到,主旨不明,成为一段时期所要总结的对象的“大事记”;有的《总结》形式呆板,千人一面。没有深度和新意,影响到《总结》应有功能的发挥。产生这些问题的主要原因是没有对所要总结的工作作出全面深入的分析,不能从众多的材料中提炼、选择一个能较好反映工作 As a style often used in official documents, “summary” plays an important role in guiding people’s work, study and social practice. However, in practice, due to many factors, many “summary” writers are often difficult to proceed from the objective reality, in-depth theoretical thinking, summed up the distinctive, original, with regularity, such as Some “summing-up” is exhaustive and its purpose is unclear, making it a “memorabilia” for the object to be summed up for a period of time. Some summing up form is dull and one-sided. No depth and new ideas, affecting the “summary” should have the function of play. The main reason for these problems is that they do not make a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the work to be summarized, can not be extracted from a large number of materials, choose one that can better reflect the work