论文部分内容阅读
宪法司法化必然要求法院对宪法的解释权;宪法司法化要求存在一部成文宪法,法院适用、解释宪法有成文宪法的明确授权,解释规则明确,以“权力分立与制衡”为政治原则,拥有解释共同体的传统和遵循先例的整合机制,社会存在司法信赖,法官具有相适应的法学素养和政策判断能力,具有崇高的声誉和地位;而依我国宪法,法院没有适用宪法的职权、没有解释宪法的职权、没有监督宪法实施的职权;宪法司法化同我国的政治理念、政治制度相矛盾,缺乏遵循先例的传统,既存条件不能满足宪法司法化的要求,宪法司法化同社会转型时期的社会要求不相适应;宪法司法化是对宪法性质、功能、宪法效力以及宪法诉讼的误读。
The judicialization of the constitution necessarily requires the court to interpret the constitution. The judicialization of the constitution requires the existence of a written Constitution, the application of the court, the express authorization of the constitution with a written constitution, the clear interpretation of the rules, the political principle of “separation of powers and checks and balances” , Has the tradition of explaining the community and follow the precedent of the integration mechanism, the existence of judicial trust in the community, the judge has the legal literacy and the ability to judge the policy, with a high reputation and status; and according to our constitution, the court did not apply the constitutional authority, there is no There is no tradition of following the precedent, the existing conditions can not meet the requirements of judicialization of the constitution, the judicialization of the Constitution and the period of social transition Social demands are incompatible with each other. Judicial constitutionalization is a misunderstanding of the constitutional nature, function, constitutional effectiveness and constitutional lawsuits.