鼠神经生长因子不同给药方式治疗职业性噪声聋的临床研究

来源 :中国医师进修杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:fengyu3
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨鼓室内注射与肌肉注射鼠神经生长因子治疗职业性噪声聋(ONID)的疗效对比。方法:选择辽宁省人民医院2018年1月至2019年12月收治的66例ONID患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为对照组、研究组,每组33例,两组患者均给予常规治疗,研究组在常规治疗基础上给予鼓室内注射鼠神经生长因子20 μg,两耳分别隔日注射1次;对照组在常规治疗基础上给予肌肉注射鼠神经生长因子20 μg,每日1次。两组均治疗28 d,比较两组左、右耳语频平均听阈,患者自觉耳鸣、头晕、头痛、失眠等症状改善情况,疗效,汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分及不良反应。结果:两组治疗前左、右耳语频听阈比较差异无统计学意义(n P>0.05)。治疗后研究组左、右耳语频听阈均明显低于对照组[(23.8 ± 4.2) dB/HL比(34.5 ± 3.9) dB/HL、(23.2 ± 4.4) dB/HL比(35.9 ± 5.1) dB/HL],差异有统计学意义(n P0.05). After treatment, the hearing thresholds of left whisper frequency and right whisper frequency in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group: (23.8 ± 4.2) dB/HL vs. (34.5 ± 3.9) dB/HL, (23.2 ± 4.4) dB/HL vs. (35.9 ± 5.1) dB/HL, and there were statistical differences (n P<0.05). After treatment, tinnitus and dizziness symptom improvement rate in the study group were higher than those in the control group: 93.3% (28/30) vs. 72.4% (21/29), 15/17 vs. 8/16, and there were statistically significant differences (n χ2 = 4.584 and 5.705, n P0.05). The total effective rate in the treatment group was significantly higher than that in the control group: 90.9% (30/33) vs. 69.7% (23/33), and there was statistical difference (n χ2 = 4.694, n P<0.05). After treatment, the scores of HAMD of 2 groups were significantly decreased, and the scores of HAMD in the study group was lower than that in control group: (8.46 ± 3.13) scores vs. (10.55 ± 3.83) scores, and there was statistical difference (n P0.05).n Conclusions:The injection of mouse nerve growth factor into drum room to treat ONID can effectively improve the hearing level of patients, alleviate tinnitus and dizziness symptoms and improve adverse mood without obvious adverse reactions.
其他文献
目的:探讨Penumbra系统逆向半回收Solitaire支架治疗急性基底动脉闭塞的疗效。方法:回顾性分析中国医科大学附属盛京医院2017年1月至2019年12月15例急性基底动脉闭塞患者的临
目的:研究PCPA对大鼠大脑皮质P450scc、CB1R、MAP2 mRNA表达的影响,探讨酸枣仁汤治疗失眠的潜在机制.方法:SPF级SD大鼠50只,随机分为正常组、对照组、PCPA组、酸枣仁汤组、PC