论文部分内容阅读
在清代社会,“坟禁”是一种重要的民间习俗。清代法律对于官山上的“坟禁”大小作了强制性规定,但是私人之间则可以通过契约对“坟禁”的大小进行自由设定,法律并不作太多干预。由于“禁步”不仅关涉土地权利,而且还同风水观念、孝义伦理相关联,由“坟禁”而引发的“田土”争讼就比较常见。官府在审断官山上因“坟禁”而引发的讼案时会参照《大清律例》的相关规定,同时也会尊重私人之间的“田土”契约,如果“坟禁”既非官山,又没有“田土”契约进行设定时,官府则会认同当地的民间习俗。由此可见,清代官府对于“坟禁”问题的处理原则同现行的《物权法》具有惊人的相通性。
In Qing society, “grave ban” is an important folk custom. The law of the Qing Dynasty imposed mandatory provisions on the size of the “grave ban” in Guanshan. However, the size of the “grave ban” can be freely set by the contract between the private parties, and the law does not interfere too much. Because “Forbidden City ” is not only related to land rights, but also related to feng shui concept, ethics of Xiaoyi, caused by “grave ban ” caused “land ” dispute is more common. In examining the litigation triggered by the “grave ban” on the mountain, the government would refer to the relevant provisions of the “Qing Law” and also respect the “land” contract between the private individuals. If the “grave” Ban “is neither official nor land contract to set, the government will recognize the local folk customs. Thus it can be seen that the principle of handling the issue of ”grave ban“ in the Qing Dynasty was an astonishingly interlinked with the existing ”Property Law".