论文部分内容阅读
在我国当前的司法实践中,鉴定是一个不那么令人满意的法律服务领域。从前几年的“多头鉴定”、“人情鉴定”等现象,到如今的鉴定立法混乱等弊端,鉴定制度可谓问题多多。那么,中国鉴定制度的未来之路应该走向何方,应该从何处下手改良?这些疑问一直困扰着立法者与学术界,一度成为学界关注的绝对热点。2004年3月31日,来自公、法、学三位青年专家学者登台“德恒证据学论坛”第三讲,即“青年论坛”系列第二讲,围绕“中国鉴定制度的问题与出路”的论题,分别从不同角度表达了他们的声音。我们相信,您定能从中获得别样的信息,收获青年才俊研讨法律难题的智慧……
In our current judicial practice, accreditation is a less satisfactory area of legal services. In the past few years, such phenomena as the “long identification” and “human identification” have brought many problems such as the confusion of the current identification legislation and the identification system. So, where should the future of China’s accreditation system go? Where should we start the process of improvement? These questions have plagued legislators and academics and have become absolutely hot spots for academic attention. On March 31, 2004, three young experts and scholars from the public, legal and academic institutions debated on the platform of “Deheng Evidence-based Forum”, the third lecture entitled “Young Forums” series, focusing on the “China Accreditation System Problems and ways out ”, respectively, voiced their voices from different angles. We believe that you will certainly get different kinds of information and gain the wisdom of young talents to discuss legal problems ...