论文部分内容阅读
本文在对科研机构、高等学校、科技信息机构和公司企业的多样化和多层次的用户群调查的基础上，采用德尔菲法进行二轮的“方案相对重要性评价”专家咨询。应用计算机对专家评分进行了专家意见集中程度、专家意见协调程度二项五个指标的统计分析。将“科教网”上“用户所需信息类别”、“用户所需信息服务方式”和“目前联网服务存在的障碍”中的各方案相对重要性进行了排序。并对各省市的生产总值以及全国科研机构、高等学校、科技情报和文献机构数、职工数和经费用条形图和玫瑰图进行了对比，以供国家制定“科教网”规划时参考。
Based on the investigation of diversified and multi-level user groups of scientific research institutes, colleges and universities, scientific and technological information agencies and corporate enterprises, this paper uses Delphi method to conduct two rounds of expert advice on the relative importance of programs. Applying computer to expert scoring, we made a statistical analysis on the concentration of expert opinion and the coordination of experts. The “science and education network” on the “user-required information types,” “information services users need,” and “the current network services exist barriers” in the relative importance of the programs were sorted. And compared the GDP of various provinces and municipalities as well as the bar charts and rose figures of the national scientific research institutes, colleges and universities, scientific and technological intelligence and literature institutions, staff numbers and expenditures for the reference of the State in formulating the “science and education network” plan.