村上在“奥姆事件”之后,虽标榜要以社会责任感探究日本回避责任型社会体制缺陷的问题,但是,他在对有关“诺门坎事件”和“沙林暴力事件”的思考中,却与这美丽的口号产生了严重的偏离。村上的历史观与美化日本侵略战争的皇国史观如出一辙,他背离了一个有良知、有正义感的作家所应背负的使命感。 Although Murakami posed for Social Responsibility to explore Japan’s question of avoiding the deficiencies of a responsible social system after the “Aum Incident,” he said that while he was concerned about the “Normenkas incident” and “Sarin violence” In the thinking, but with this beautiful slogan had a serious deviation. Murakami’s conception of history is exactly the same as the one used to beautify Japan’s aggressive war. He departed from the sense of mission that a writer with conscience and justice should bear.