论文部分内容阅读
据《科学》杂志报道,美国国会组织领导的一个专门工作小组——由12名成员组成的“科研公德委员会”(Commission on Research Integrity)——在经过对联邦政府的科研公德政策进行了一年多的调查后,得出结论认为,现有的关于科研不端行为的定义漏掉了许多实际有害的东西,因而建议将大学和联邦“科研公德署”(Office of Research Integrity或ORI)目前所用的科研不端行为标准扩大至包括“不尊重他人的智力劳动成果知识财产”等恶劣行为,并提出有关科研不端行为的新定义。他们认为新的定义将可弥补现有定义的模糊性。
According to the Science magazine, a dedicated working group led by the U.S. Congress, a 12-member Commission on Research Integrity, has been in compliance with the federal government's research ethics policy for one year Many surveys concluded that the existing definition of scientific misconduct omits many of the actual harmful things that suggest the current use by universities and the federal Office of Research Integrity or ORI Of the standard of scientific misconduct was expanded to include the bad behavior of “intellectual property that does not respect the intellectual property of others” and proposed a new definition of scientific misconduct. They think the new definition will make up for the fuzziness of the existing definition.