论文部分内容阅读
目的了解四川地震灾区教师的应付方式现状及影响因素。方法使用应付方式问卷对四川地震灾区的741名教师进行调查。结果①灾区教师较多地采用解决问题(0.870±0.128)和求助(0.707±0.186)的应付方式,较少使用自责(0.380±0.240)的应付方式;②灾区教师的应付方式的解决问题因子在教龄(F=9.138,P<0.001)上差异显著;求助因子在学校类型(F=2.874,P<0.05)上差异显著;自责因子在年龄(t=2.281,P<0.05)上差异显著;幻想因子在性别(t=-2.143,P<0.05)上差异显著;退避和合理化因子在学校类型(F=2.944,2.889;P<0.05)上差异显著。结论灾区教师较多地采用成熟型的应付方式,且应付方式受性别、年龄、教龄、职称、学校类型及城乡差异的影响较大。
Objective To understand the status quo and influencing factors of teachers’ coping styles in Sichuan earthquake-hit areas. Methods A questionnaire of coping style was used to investigate 741 teachers in the quake-stricken area of Sichuan Province. Results ①The teachers in disaster areas adopted coping styles of solving problems (0.870 ± 0.128) and asking for help (0.707 ± 0.186), and using coping styles less frequently (0.380 ± 0.240); ② Solving problems of teachers in coping style There was a significant difference in the teaching age (F = 9.138, P <0.001). The asking for help factor was significantly different in the school type (F = 2.874, P <0.05) ; The fantasy factor has significant difference in gender (t = -2.143, P <0.05); and the withdrawal and rationalization factors have significant difference in school type (F = 2.944,2.889; P <0.05). Conclusion The teachers in the disaster areas have adopted more mature coping styles and their coping styles are greatly influenced by the gender, age, teaching age, job title, school type and urban-rural differences.