论文部分内容阅读
法律推理过程包含着权力与利益、应然与实然、确定性与妥当性、客观解释与主观解释等矛盾,法律推理促动法律规范由普遍规则到个案规则适用,法律推理涉及法律事实认定、法律规范识别、法律价值追寻,涉及推理主体关于知识论与实践理性的思考,法律推理的重心由立法领域到司法领域、由法律本体论到方法论、由法律移植到制度理性整合、由宏观论证到微观分析的转向。法律推理呈现内部逻辑强制与外部言说理性互动的特征,已经由法律文本所体现的规范层面转向法律施行的实践层面,形成事实与价值、事实与规范的交互流转。
The process of legal reasoning contains the contradictions between power and interest, should be true and certain, certainty and appropriateness, objective interpretation and subjective interpretation, legal reasoning should promote the application of legal norms from universal rules to case rules, legal reasoning involves the determination of legal facts, Legal norms identification and legal value pursuing. It involves the subject of reasoning on the epistemology and practical rationality. The center of gravity of legal reasoning is from the field of law to the field of justice, from the legal ontology to the methodology, from the law to institutional rational integration, from the macro argument to Micro-analysis of the turn. Legal reasoning presents the characteristic of rational interaction between internal logic and external utterance. It has turned from the normative level embodied in legal texts to the practical level of law enforcement to form an interactive flow of facts and values, facts and norms.